Česká verze
 

Seminar takes place on Thursday at 9 a.m. in Praktikum KPMS, Sokolovská 83, Praha 8.

Seminar programme will be consequently updated. Guests are welcomed.

  • Reflections on risk and dynamics in stochastic programming models. + upřesnění dalšího programu

    Author:
    Prof. RNDr. Jitka Dupačová, DrSc.
    Date:
    28th February 2008
  • Risk-Sensitive Control of Markov Chains and its Application to Portfolio Management.

    Author:
    Ing. Karel Sladký (ÚTIA)
    Date:
    13th March 2008
  • Actual stochastic programming problems.

    Author:
    Mgr. Martin Branda
    Date:
    20th March 2008
  • The rate of convergence - generalization.

    Author:
    RNDr. Vlasta Kaňková
    Date:
    27th March 2008
  • Stochastic approximation in stochastic programming.

    Author:
    Prof. RNDr. Václav Dupač, DrSc.
    Date:
    10th April 2008
  • Thesis.

    Author:
    RNDr. Jana Čerbáková
    Date:
    24th April 2008
  • Stochastic programming with random rightside vector - the minimax approach.

    Author:
    Pavel Kříž
    Date:
    15th May 2008
  • ... will be specified ...

    Author:
    Prof. David Morton (USA)
    Date:
    22nd May 2008
    Abstract:

    Stochastic programming facilitates decision making under uncertainty. Unfortunately, it is usually impractical to find an optimal solution to a stochastic program. Confidence intervals on the optimal value, or optimal gap of a candidate solution, can be obtained using Monte Carlo approximations. However, the standard point estimate of the optimal value, or optimality gap, contains bias due to the nature of the sampling-based approximation. We provide a method to reduce this bias, and hence provide a better, i.e., tighter, confidence interval on the optimal value or a candidate solution's optimality gap. Our method requires less restrictive assumptions on the structure of the bias than previously-available estimators, and we establish desirable statistical properties of our estimators. Our estimators adapt to problem-specific properties, and we provide a family of estimators, which allows flexibility in choosing the level of aggressiveness for bias reduction. We compare our estimators with known techniques on test problems from the literature.

 

Copyright © Jana Čerbáková, 2007